首页  |  考研动态  |  招生信息  |  考研指导  |  院校招聘  |  录取调剂  |  院校专业  |  考研专题  |  复习资料
招生简章  |  考研常识  |  报考攻略  |  复试技巧  |  参考数据  |  分数信息  |  复习笔记  |  历年试题  |  考研图书
专业硕士  |  E(MBA)  |  工程硕士  |  法律硕士  |  会计硕士  |  教育硕士  |  公共卫生硕士  |  公共管理硕士  |  在职读硕  |  同等学历  |  中外合作办学
考研心路  |  考研故事  |  心里调节   |  考研与工作   |  考研与爱情   |  考研与家庭   |  考研同路人  |  考研名师


2012年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语(一)试题

减小字体增大字体

Two paradoxes exist throughout this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing Knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not re-search. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Azent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as “seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought.” But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]  下一页

 
发表评论】【告诉好友】【打印此文】【关闭窗口
 

诚聘英才 - 广告服务 - 付款方式 - 网站声明 - 联系方式 - 中华人民共和国信息产业部网站备案号:京ICP备06045659号
 
服务热线电话:  86-10-87839609   mailto:webmaster@cnkyedu.com  网络实名:中国研究生信息网
Copyright © 2000-2010 Cnkyedu.Com Inc. All rights reserved.  通用网址:中国研究生信息网

中国研究生信息网 版权所有   本站信息未经授权不得复制或建立本站镜像